Planned Parenthood and Immigration Control: What You Should Know and Probably Don’t

planned_parenthood_logoPlanned Parenthood is back in the news for the very worst reasons. While it should not be a surprise to anyone with half a brain that they do this sort of work (selling the parts of aborted babies – in case you missed it), it ought to at least nudge those Catholics who support candidates who wish God’s blessings on PP to think twice about doing so.

But all of this has reminded me that for all the righteous, conservative outrage at Planned Parenthood and the political establishment that supports them, it is these same conservatives who are ever so willing to sidle up to the anti-immigration reform members of the Planned Parenthood family. Don’t know what I’m talking about?

If you follow the immigration debate you’ve probably heard of the Federation for American Immigration Reform or FAIR. Given the name of the group, you might think that they are for immigration reform, but you’d be mostly wrong. They’re for a kind of reform which amounts to mass deportations and severe restrictions on any future immigration for anyone.

Take a look at FAIR’s candidate questionnaire for instance. A prominent Catholic has used this questionnaire as a litmus test for her support for Republican candidates. The test boils down the complexity of immigration reform to three basic questions. Is a candidate for or against (1) amnesty; (2) increasing the number of guest workers; and/or (3) increasing the overall level of immigration? Only if the candidate stands against all three ought he or she get our vote.

So FAIR isn’t just against illegal immigration. FAIR won’t be satisfied until we drop all immigration down to the “traditional rate” of 300,000 a year. They say that their interest is in the American worker, but concern for labor is just the game they play to get you to think they care about people. In truth, FAIR is all about population control. Taking a look at their founders and board members tells the true story.

The Population Bomb

Dr. John Tanton

Dr. John Tanton

FAIR was founded in 1979 by a man named Dr. John H. Tanton. Tanton’s journey began with Paul Ehrlich’s 1968 book The Population Bomb, which predicted brutal, world-wide starvation in the 1970’s and ‘80’s due to overpopulation. It doesn’t matter to Tanton or to Ehrlich that the latter’s predictions didn’t come true. In fact, Ehrlich still believes he’s right and insists that he didn’t go far enough in his predictions. No, they both believe that the environment is still in danger because there are just too many of us pesky humans, and we need to do something about that now.This concern for the environment led Tanton to become deeply involved in the population control movement from then on. So involved was he that in 1975 he was elected the national president of the organization Zero Population Growth (currently called Population Connection), which was inspired by Ehrlich’s book.

Now, as the 1960’s marched along, contraception became cheaper and more available, and abortion became legal in 1972. The birth rate in America fell below replacement levels by the late 1970’s. The Zero Population Growth movement had succeeded. Tanton understood then that the new frontier for population control was immigration. It was for this reason that he founded FAIR.

His was not a new tactic. The eugenics movement in America had already tried this earlier in the 20th century. For instance, the 1924 Johnson-Reed Immigration Restriction Act was shaped in part by Harry H. Laughlin, one of the founders of the American Eugenics Society (wikipedia article). As a result of that act, immigration was severely capped for all nations but especially for places like Poland, Italy, and the Balkans. Why? According to Laughlin there were too many unfit people living in those nations.

So none of this is new. Tanton and his friends at FAIR are just the latest version of eugenicists seeking to curb immigration. So let’s meet some of those friends.

From L-R: Judy Kunofsky, president Zero Population Growth 1977-1980; Garrett Hardin; Helen Graham, president Californians for Population Stabilization; M. Rupert Cutler, Executive Director Pop. Env. Balance 1983-1987. All the organizations represented here have been funded at some point in time by John Tanton.

From L-R: Judy Kunofsky, president Zero Population Growth 1977-1980; Garrett Hardin; Helen Graham, president Californians for Population Stabilization; M. Rupert Cutler, Executive Director Pop. Env. Balance 1983-1987. All the organizations represented here have been funded at some point in time by John Tanton.

The Eugenics Crowd

Garrett Hardin (pictured above second from the left) was an environmentalist and a founding board member of FAIR. He was also a member of the American Eugenics Society and buddies with Dr. Alan Guttmacher, once president of Planned Parenthood as well as vice-president of the Eugenics Society. Hardin was one of the key figures who helped Guttmacher and others legalize abortion. Of the many shocking things Hardin wrote, here is just one of his choicest:

“To survive, rich nations must refuse immigration to people who are poor because their governments are unable or unwilling to stop population growth.” (“Living on a Lifeboat” Bioscience. 24:294)

Immigration must be curbed so as to dissuade poorer peoples from continuing to have children. For Hardin the point is not the rule of law. He was against legal immigration too. The whole point was saving the environment and changing the “breeding habits” of developing nations. This ideology is the foundation for FAIR. Hardin died in 2003, but FAIR is no less eugenicist today. Especially given who still advises them.

Donald A. Collins, Sr. is formerly a long-time member of the board of directors of FAIR, but is currently the co-chair of the advisory board. He is also a founding member of the International Services Assistance Fund, which promotes the research and development of female non-surgical sterilization. He is a founding member of the Alan Guttmacher Institute, the research arm of Planned Parenthood. Collins also helped found the International Projects Assistance Service which manufactures a portable abortion device that can be smuggled into nations where abortion is illegal. He is, in short, a man who has dedicated his life to developing and distributing contraception, sterilization and abortion products all around the world.

Collins is also an Anti-Catholic with a capital ‘A.’ He sees the pro-immigration reform movement in the U.S. as a plan by the Vatican to infiltrate our country with Catholics and further control the government by placing more Catholics in government, more Catholics on the voter rolls and more Catholics on the Supreme Court. Like the know-nothings before him, Collins is determined to remove Catholic influences from every major field. Unless, of course, those Catholics agree with him about contraception and abortion.

Donald A. Collins

Donald A. Collins

Collins is not just any board member either. His involvement with FAIR has been decades-long and he has made membership on the board a family effort. Collins’ son, Don Collins, Jr. is currently the chairman of the board. Also a member of the board of directors is Collins’ current wife, Sarah Epstein, whose entire life, like the life of his previous wife, has been steeped in the population control and eugenics movements.

Sarah G. Epstein’s father was Dr. Clarence James Gamble, heir to the Procter & Gamble soap fortune (wikipedia article) and close collaborator with Margaret Sanger founder of Planned Parenthood. In 1947 he helped found the Human Betterment League of North Carolina with James Hanes (yes, of Hanes clothing). The League was involved in forced sterilization of men and women of poor, unintelligent and/or minority backgrounds in order to “relieve” welfare in the state of North Carolina from the burden of having to care for such drags on human progress. That state ended the program in 1977 but didn’t apologize for it until 2002.

The fact that Epstein grew up in a family that didn’t seem to have a problem with forced sterilizations might explain why Epstein had this to say about China’s one-child policy in a letter to the editors for the New York Times:

“I think the Chinese have developed one of the most humane and rational population policies in the world. No one is forced to have an abortion, and all are encouraged to limit families. We can learn for our own future. Allowing any pregnant Chinese couple to gain asylum here on assertion of fear of forced abortion at home . . . makes a mockery of our asylum law. . . . Let us work out a rational population policy for our own country and respect policies of other countries that are dealing humanely with the critical need to slow population growth.”

Encouraged to limit families”? China’s one-child policy has indeed involved forced abortions. Ms. Epstein should have known that before she referred to it as “humane.” But what we also see in this quote is that for these radical eugenicists immigration policy is intimately tied up with population control. Whether its Laughlin, Hardin or Epstein, they all want to keep people out of the U.S. because to do otherwise would be to encourage life in poor countries, and life is dangerous to the environment.

Epstein has followed her father’s example in more ways than one. A long-time member of the Planned Parenthood board for Metropolitan Washington, she is an emeritus director for Pathfinder International, which was also founded by her father. Today, it is one of the leading providers of abortions internationally.

Speaking of the international abortion industry, Epstein is also a former board member of The Population Institute which seeks to make abortion more available here and everywhere. Indeed, when she wrote her above letter to the editor, she did so as a member of the board of advisers to the Population Institute. Their Public Policy Advisory Committee includes well-known pro-abortion advocates like Barbara Boxer, John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Olympia Snowe and Ted Turner. Their International Advisory Committee includes none other than Paul Ehrlich, one of the originators of this modern wave of population control.

Alan N. Weeden is another member of the board of advisors who has been a long-time member of the board of directors of FAIR. He is the president of the Weeden Foundation which was founded by his father, Frank Weeden. The Foundation exists in order to research ways population increases effect biodiversity and thus negatively effects the environment. So what sort of stuff does the Weeden Foundation fund? According to their website, within the U.S. they have worked to expand abortion clinics and promote “immigration reduction.” For the past decade they have focused their international work on efforts “designed to liberalize abortion laws within Latin America.”

Towards that international work, the Weeden Foundation helps fund Catholics for Choice, a pro-abortion group of “Catholics.” They explain that Catholics for Choice helps to promote and expand access to abortion for women in Latin America. In 2004, 2005, 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2013 the Foundation granted Catholics for Choice $20,000. Since last year they increased their support to $25,000 per annum.

The Weeden Foundation also funds the Center for Immigration Studies and NumbersUSA. That’s significant because those two organizations were also founded by none other than John Tanton, who has a penchant for founding and funding organizations in order to network different efforts.  Let’s look at that network.

The Network

Dr. Tanton founded U.S. Inc. in 1981 as a kind of umbrella organization meant to fund several smaller groups with similar interests. This approach allows him and his movement to do several things at once: (1) give a sense of large numbers to the anti-immigration movement, (2) approach the immigration issue from several angles at once and (3) pool resources and techniques. Though they are separate organizations, they are all either founded and supported or simply funded by U.S. Inc. and John Tanton.

According to its website, U.S. Inc. exists to “educate the public about the need for common sense immigration reform, the need to protect and conserve our natural resources, the impact of population on the environment, and the need to promote and preserve English as the common, unifying language of the United States.” It does this through numerous projects and by funding various groups that advance these efforts. This includes:

  • The American Immigration Control Foundation (AIC Foundation) was founded in 1983  and has been funded by U.S. Inc. It’s head is  John Vinson who’s been in charge since 1990. Astonishingly, Mr. Vinson has been associated with racist, white supremacist organizations.
  • American Patrol/Voice of Citizens Together is a website for stories about how terrible immigrants are and is led by Glenn Spencer, who is convinced that immigration is a plot by Mexico to reconquer the U.S. His associations have been sketchy, and included some racist groups. The organization has been funded by U.S. Inc.
  • Barbara Coe and one of her famous conspiratorial statements: “Our research revealed that illegal aliens are the ground troops needed by Bush Jr. and his globalist buddies for the ultimate death of America.”

    Barbara Coe and one of her famous conspiratorial statements: “Our research revealed that illegal aliens are the ground troops needed by Bush Jr. and his globalist buddies for the ultimate death of America.”

    U.S. Inc. also funded California Coalition for Immigration Reform (CCIR), which was founded in 1994 by Barbara Coe to serve as a co-sponsor for California’s controversial Proposition 187 (wikipedia article), or the “Save our State” initiative. Prop 187 was designed to deny social and medical benefits to undocumented women or their children. The idea was to remove any sort of incentive for illegal immigrants to come over to the United States. The result, however, was denying medical care to poor women who were already pregnant. The proposition passed in the 1994 election, but was killed by Gov. Davis in 1999. Ms. Coe died in 2013, but not before years of strange, passingly racist and conspiratorial statements about illegal immigrants. Eventually, she admitted to being a member of the Council of Conservative Citizens, a racist organization. More on that later.

  • Californians for Population Stabilization (CAPS), founded in 1986 with John Tanton, has been funded by U.S. Inc. and exists to bring awareness of how greater population control is needed. It’s headed by Dick Schneider, who is also a board member of the Institute for Population Studies. On its website, one of its senior writers advocates for limiting child tax credits to one child and taxing families who choose to have more than one. On their board of advisors one finds John D. Weeden of the Weeden Foundation, and Richard D. Lamm, the former Governor of Colorado who is famous for having said back in 1984 that the elderly have a “duty to die” and “get out of the way” to “let the other society, our kids, build a reasonable life.” John Vinson of the AIC Foundation is listed by CAPS as a Senior Writing Fellow. There are several incestuous associations here from within the network.
  • Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) was founded by John Tanton in 1985 and is perhaps the best known of the organizations associated with FAIR and U.S. Inc. It is the research arm of U.S. Inc. and provides statistics and studies on immigration to news reporters and opinion makers. CIS is headed by Mark Krikorian who oddly has denied any connection between CIS and U.S. Inc or John Tanton in particular, though their connection is a matter of public record. In fact CIS and FAIR even share some board members.
  • NumbersUSA was founded in 1996 by Roy Beck and John Tanton. It exists to educate the public on immigration and to change public policy so that all immigration can be lowered and held steady at the “traditional levels” which will allow for “assimilation” of new immigrants, whatever that means. Numbers’ board of directors includes Don Wheeden the Executive Director of the Weeden Foundation mentioned above. Also listed is Philip Cafaro who recently wrote a book pleading with progressives to get behind lowering immigration. The book was praised by CAPS.
  • Population-Environment Balance (formerly The Environment Fund) was founded in 1973 in order to stabilize the U.S. population so as to “safeguard the carrying capacity of the United States.” John Tanton was a board member from 1980-1990 and they advocate for limited immigration. Tanton funded some of their work through U.S. Inc.
  • ProEnglish, founded by John Tanton in 1994 and headed today by Robert Vandervoort, it is part of an effort to make English the official language of the U.S. Why this is important may become apparent later, but it should be noted that the effort is part of U.S. Inc.’s mission too. ProEnglish was founded only after Tanton was forced to step down from U.S. English, which he also founded. Among ProEnglish’s efforts is to keep any government documents or voting ballots from being translated into any language but English. Referring to it as “offensive,” in 2014 ProEnglish protested against Coca-Cola’s Super Bowl ad featuring ethnically diverse Americans singing “America the Beautiful” in different languages. Vandervoort has been associated with racist organizations.
  • U.S. English, cofounded in 1983 by John Tanton and Senator S. I. Hayakawa it seeks to make English the official language of the U.S. It had and has broad-based support. Tanton was forced to resign in 1988 when a memo leaked to the media revealed Tanton’s distaste for Hispanics.
  • The Social Contract Press was founded by John Tanton in 1990 and is edited by Wayne Lutton, who is part of the staff of U.S. Inc. The Press publishes work by Tanton and his friends on immigration, the environment, population control, anti-Catholic drivel and other issues. Lutton has been associated with racist organizations as well.

One may have noticed a recurring theme here, and that is the connection of some of these persons with racist organizations. I do not use that word lightly. I happen to think it is used too often and used to shut down debate and dialogue. Also, members of this network have stated publicly their desire to end racism. Frank Morris, a board member of FAIR and of CIS, is himself a black man. Nevertheless, the evidence for other more strident racism is hard to ignore.

Barbara Coe (Prop 187) admitted to being a member of and John Vinson (AIC FOundation and CAPS) and Wayne Lutton (Social Contract Press) have both been speakers at the Council of Conservative Citizens. The CCC’s own statement of principles states that they oppose

“the massive immigration of non-European and non-Western peoples into the United States that threatens to transform our nation into a non-European majority in our lifetime. We believe that illegal immigration must be stopped, if necessary by military force and placing troops on our national borders; that illegal aliens must be returned to their own countries; and that legal immigration must be severely restricted or halted through appropriate changes in our laws and policies.”

In case you thought that “non-European” doesn’t necessarily mean non-white, they go on to say:

“We also oppose all efforts to mix the races of mankind, to promote non-white races over the European-American people through so-called ‘affirmative action’ and similar measures, to destroy or denigrate the European-American heritage, including the heritage of the Southern people, and to force the integration of the races.”

Margaret Sanger would be very comfortable with this crowd.

Margaret Sanger would be very comfortable with this crowd.

Later they state that they “oppose all efforts by the state and other powers to weaken the structure of the American family through [the] … mixture of the races ….” This is racism. This is white supremacist language through and through, and this is an organization to which Coe, Vinson and Lutton have linked themselves.

Then there is Robert Vandervoort (ProEnglish) who has supported the work of a group called American Renaissance. Again, on their own website, they list as one of their issues:

“One of the most destructive myths of modern times is that people of all races have the same average intelligence. It is widely accepted that genes account for much of the difference in intelligence between individuals, but many people still refuse to believe genes explain group differences in average intelligence. This blindness leads to futile attempts to eliminate ‘achievement gaps’ between the races and leads whites to accept the view that if blacks and Hispanics are less successful than whites, it is because of white ‘racism.'”

The obvious reason for that gap, then, is that blacks and Hispanics (including yours truly one would imagine) are on average innately less intelligent that whites. American Renaissance goes on to argue that “some of the most powerful writing in AR is by ordinary people describing their everyday experiences with non-whites. Each of these accounts is a compelling story about the continuing tragedy of multi-racialism.” Gripping stuff. Glenn Spencer has also been associated with American Renaissance since he invited their head to be a guest on his show.

In doing all this research for this post I could not but come to the conclusion that eugenicist racism is constitutive to this network. But of course, that shouldn’t be a surprise. Planned Parenthood, the population control Goliath of the U.S. was founded by this same ideology. Margaret Sanger had this to say in a letter to Dr. Clarence James Gamble, mentioned above, father of Sarah Epstein:

“There is only one thing that I would like to be in touch with and that is the Negro Project of the South….

“Miss Rose sent me a copy of your letter of December 5th and I note that you doubt it worthwhile to employ a full time Negro physician. It seems to me from my experience…that while the colored Negroes have great respect for white doctors they can get closer to their own members and more or less lay their cards on the table which means their ignorance, superstitions and doubts….

“The ministers work is also important and also he should be trained, perhaps by the [Planned Parenthood] Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

This letter from Sanger doesn’t admit, as some argue, that the Federation wanted to exterminate the Negro population, only that she didn’t want people to get that impression. She is clearly not above working with blacks in order to achieve her ends. Several black leaders and ministers (Martin Luther King, Jr. to name just one) supported her work. Nevertheless, the tone and the purpose  of the letter is clear: get those ignorant black people on board with our plan. And the fact that in 2012 more black babies were aborted than born in New York City seems to confirm the fears of the “more rebellious members” of the African American community.

Sanger, Epstein, Collins, Tanton, Wheeden, Lutton, Vinson, Coe, all of them hold a diametrically opposed view on life than we. Catholics have rightly been condemning Planned Parenthood for its ghoulish practices this past week. But Catholics need to know that the same ideological children of Planned Parenthood’s Margaret Sanger are funding these anti-immigration organizations. Yes, there is room for Catholics to differ on how to address the immigration reform that desperately needs to happen. But touting the work of CIS or NumbersUSA is not the way to do it. Don’t give these sons and daughters of Planned Parenthood any more legitimacy than they deserve.

  1. Michael J. Vinca said:

    Good article except for the statement “it is these same conservatives who are ever so willing to sidle up to the anti-immigration reform members of the Planned Parenthood family.” I think such a statement could only come from a misunderstanding of what the majority of conservatives believe. You even show the path to white supremacy and racist groups. Such things would indicate ties to liberals, not conservatives.

    • Thanks Michael, but I think you maybe missed my point. Maybe I could have been more explicit in saying that I don’t think conservatives know the background of these organizations but it is true that conservatives sidle up to FAIR and CIS and NumbersUSA. If you listen to any conservative radio, Laura Ingraham or Mark Steyn, or watch Fox News you’ll hear these groups named as authorities on immigration. Ingraham – who was just this morning decrying PP’s practices – used FAIR’s candidate questionnaire during the 2014 election season. I don’t know if she is aware of their roots, but she really ought to since I think she would be appalled. Anyway, thanks for reading my piece.

      • asydwy said:

        Please do NOT lump all Conservatives to the far right fringe groups . Both parties have them ( extreme fringe groups) but most members
        are much more moderate. I am a fan of Fox News and I have never heard any of those you mention endorse these groups or positions.
        I agree that many in both political groups need to be better informed,
        especially about immigration which is most complex and really involves lots of sub-issues like environment, population control and most important our current and future economic policies. This is the reason that little has been accomplished in untangling the morass of interconnected issues. Where to begin?

        • It’s exactly because I think there are more moderates that I share this information. I think most conservatives, particularly Catholic conservatives, would be shocked to discover this information and so would rethink how they approach this issue of immigration and the voices behind limiting it. I’m not trying to lump all conservatives into these far right groups.

          You may have never heard these organizations endorsed, but you should do a search on the Fox News website for CIS or NumbersUSA. Look here for instance.

  2. I’m glad I read this; sobering, though. I will send it to my husband and teenaged sons. Thank you for all your work in researching and writing; I am wiser for it. God bless.

    • Thanks Allison. Yes “sobering” is the right word. I tell you I was really shocked when I first learned about this a year ago. Since then I’ve prayed and wondered whether or not I should write about it. With the recent news about Planned Parenthood, I felt it was the right moment to do so. Thanks for sharing this information. I do think it is important for people to know. God bless you too.

  3. Jenny said:

    All I can say is “WOW!” I had no idea about these groups, but will definitely use this information to spread the word! Pretty sickening!

  4. Juan Pablo said:

    Eventually I just started skimming because the paragraphs started looking the same. “….and he/she associates with racists/is racist”

    Should 10-20 million people be allowed to commit the felony of coming to this country illegally? Should financial incentives exist that make the decision to come to this country illegally easier? Why is it that this country, to the exclusion of nearly every other, can’t have an official language?

    Those groups may all be racist, I’m more concerned with the incredibly inhospitable set of neighbors we have. I’m also more concerned that having millions of illegal aliens here merely lets their backwards and corrupt countries off the hook, free to continue running their countries/economies into the ground further oppressing their people.

    • Hi Juan Pablo, illegally entering the U.S. is not a felony. It is a misdemeanor. And I say nothing of allowing for or accepting illegal immigration. Depending on the year 45-55% of illegal immigration every year comes by way of people overstaying their visas. Those who can afford the visa process tend not to be subject to the grinding poverty that threatens life. So, I say, track them down and kick them out. With all our technology, we should be able to do that.

      We can have an official language. I have no problem with that. I do think it is stupid to criticize Coke for a multi-lingual ad. And I think it is relevant that the head of an organization associates with white supremicists.

      And I find it interesting that you’re more concern with our neighbors than you are with fellow Americans who are spreading hate. You and I have no control over what our neighbor do, or at least not a lot of control. But we, you and I, do have control over whether or not we promote organizations with ties to the very same eugenicist ideology that has produced Planned Parenthood and those “doctors” who so callously munch on salad while they talk about crushing babies. You can be concerned with what you like, but let’s at least agree to ACT so as to shed light on the culture of death in our own country where we find it.

  5. Ryan said:

    Never heard of FAIR. I’ve heard of La Raza.

    I can’t imagine why Planned Parenthood would be against massive immigration, legal or illegal. As a group the Latinos (with the possible exception of the Cubans) care much more about getting freebies from the American taxpayer than about the sanctity of life, and their voting patterns prove it.

    • Hi Ryan, I think I tried very hard here to help you imagine why Planned Parenthood types would be against massive immigration. In fact I very exactingly explained how founders of Planned Parenthood and the Guttmacher Institute as well as current board members of local PP chapters argue against immigration reform. It’s about population control. I can’t imagine how you missed that in my piece.

      As for Latinos and their voting patterns I’d encourage you to read my piece on Republicans and Hispanic voters as well as the studies that have been done. You’ll find that your comment about getting “freebies” is not just incendiary but also wrong.

  6. Kelso said:

    Do you remember back in the 80s when the head of Proctor and Gamble allegedly said that the company gives heavily to the “church” of Satan and that it never hired Catholics until recently. No tape of that show was ever made available. I wonder if this was true? Makes more sense now.

    • No I don’t remember that, but now you have me wondering…. Thanks for mentioning it.

  7. Nancy A Cramer said:

    Thank you very much for this article. I had heard of Numbers USA, but I had no idea of the sordid ideology the organization was linked to. My mother was extremely liberal and very anti-Catholic. She admired Margaret Sanger greatly, so I can imagine that liberals can be just as prejudiced and misguided as some political conservatives.

  8. Sheila said:

    You have connected the dots on beliefs I’ve held for a long time. In my view, Hispanics have become the “new Blacks” through the almost hysteric call for immigration reform. So often I hear people cite Hispanics’ “rabbit-like” reproduction as a reason to limit their access to our country. I like asking those folks where they think they would be if their ancestors had been denied entrance to the United States. Would they even exist because their forefathers didn’t survive the conditions of their home country? I wouldn’t. My great grandfather entered this country illegally during the potato famine in Ireland. Because of his natural desire to survive, he stowed away on a boat headed for America and lived through indenturtude to “repay” his passage. Another relative immigrated legally in order to survive after a price was put on his head during England’s oppression of Catholics in Ireland. His life was threatened by both the English and his fellow countrymen. He refused to submit to England’s religious and cultural demands and to his country men’s insistance to take up arms. How can I fault other peoples, who’s very existance is threatened by their living conditions? I’m sad to admit that sometimes I do fall victim to the voices of immigration reform and feel myself being swayed. It helps to remember from which I came. Thanks, Omar, for doing the research for us. I will be sharing this far and wide.

  9. Thanks so much! This is a great article, right on point after point (after point after point)! John Cavanaugh-O’Keefe

  10. Judith Brown said:

    Dear Kelso: your memory of Proctor and Gamble being on ‘the dark side’ is not fantasy, In the 80’s, Pentecostals in particular warned the Proctor & Gamble supported occult practices, and I remember them pointing out that the symbol on their logo (was it a crescent moon? or something like that) was indicative of darker underpinnings. Whether this was ever proved, I don’t know.

  11. Rochelle Odom said:

    Umm. So, you’re comparing a country’s natural right to have borders, and, for economic reasons, to allow in a limited amount of people at a time to the ” intrinsic evil ” that is abortion? ‘Really?

    • Hi Rochelle,

      Well… that’s really not the point of this piece. Not at all. I think the real point is that major groups that work against immigration reform are led by individuals who support racism, population control, abortion and extreme environmentalism. Really… that’s the point. I’m not comparing abortion and immigration policy as though they are moral equivalents. If you could point out where I do that I’ll be sure to correct myself. Thanks for commenting.

  12. Omar, Thank you for this wonderful article. In light of Matthew 25
    ‘Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; 35 for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, 36 I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me.’ 37 Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry and gave you food, or thirsty and gave you something to drink? 38 And when was it that we saw you a stranger and welcomed you, or naked and gave you clothing? 39 And when was it that we saw you sick or in prison and visited you?’ 40 And the king will answer them, ‘Truly I tell you, just as you did it to one of the least of these who are members of my family, you did it to me.’
    These strong words of Jesus contradict the anti-immigrant rhetoric voices among many today. We are to welcome the stranger, not judge them or classify them as ‘illegals.’ Many conservatives have been sucked into the “‘lower the immigrant population’ and we will be better off” lie. Immigrants are some of the most vulnerable among us, authorized or unauthorized. I work with immigration law and many churches (mostly ‘Evangelical’). When people use CIS and Numbers USA figures, I know that they have believed lies. Many of my close friends, including many children who were brought here undocumented, are being treated as unwanted babies. Both Catholics and Evangelicals believe that abortion is wrong, so why do we ignore God’s commands and teachings of the Church to treat the sojourner as one of us? All of us need to get to know immigrants and their families. It changes us to do justice, ‘just us’ instead of ‘them.’

  13. Linda Finke said:

    Whether it is true or not, for years P & G have been accused of being Satanists. The Company had denied this. I came from the Cincinnati area, and I remember all the hoo haw. People said their symbol of the company was pure evil, but I do remember that they explained what everything was about. You probably can write or call P & G and find out exactly what gives. I came to believe that they were telling the truth. Sometimes you hear a story so many times that you think THIS MUST BE TRUE. But other times it is just a rumor that goes on and on and on and nobody what anybody says it just seems it will not go away. Remember that there are people who truly believe that the world is flat.

Leave a Reply